Oli McBurnie

small

TH63

Ballon d'Or Winner
⭐ PLATINUM VIP ⭐
⚽ MODERATOR ⚽
🏃🏃🏃 500 PAGER 🏃🏃🏃
❹ 4 YEARS ❹
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
PICKEM 18/19 - 1st Place
PICKEM World Cup 2nd
$ BANK $
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
23,484
Reaction score
49,880
Reactions
50,689 428 125
Country
Wales
Credits
62,695,674

QM Redux

Banned
Ballon d'Or Winner
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
Joined
30 Dec 2020
Messages
4,461
Reaction score
2,071
Reactions
2,889 35 619
Country
Mars
Credits
35
Oh, so when he was acting the cock with the jacks down the CCS , we should've given him a belt then?

A point I made a while ago, but I'm happy for you repeat it given people will agree with you and not me out of principle...
 

QM Redux

Banned
Ballon d'Or Winner
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
Joined
30 Dec 2020
Messages
4,461
Reaction score
2,071
Reactions
2,889 35 619
Country
Mars
Credits
35
Any reason you're ignoring my last post, QM?

Not deliberately ignoring, didn't see it as it was on the previous page.

I'm not commenting from a perspective based on feelings, I'm basing it on the law.

There was no threat to McBurnie. He had every opportunity to de-escalate. Like it or not, it's not illegal to film in a public place, there's no right to privacy in that instance.

Am I defending the Leeds supporting twat? Nope, I'm pointing out that legally McBurnie has no defence - the actions of the other guy can be used in mitigating for any sentencing, sure but McBurnie committed assault, end of.
 

Heisenberg

Ballon d'Or Winner
❶ 1 YEAR ❶
↯ INB4 CHAMP 2021 ↯
Joined
9 Sep 2020
Messages
3,070
Reaction score
6,474
Reactions
6,452 9 18
Country
Czech-Republic
Credits
54,000
Not deliberately ignoring, didn't see it as it was on the previous page.

I'm not commenting from a perspective based on feelings, I'm basing it on the law.

There was no threat to McBurnie. He had every opportunity to de-escalate. Like it or not, it's not illegal to film in a public place, there's no right to privacy in that instance.

Am I defending the Leeds supporting twat? Nope, I'm pointing out that legally McBurnie has no defence - the actions of the other guy can be used in mitigating for any sentencing, sure but McBurnie committed assault, end of.
Obviously you're not defending him FFS :hehe:

My argument is that you've had two brief clips that don't seem to show the full story and you've decided that there are no mitigating circumstances that may have led to the assault.

You appear to have accepted the defense of the person who was attacked despite there being no evidence of what he said happened being in any of the footage that we saw.

So, despite your "end of"... McBurnie may have commited assault but we don't know whether there's more to it than that.

How do you know McBurnie has "no defence"?! You were categorical about the cop shooting someone with their gun instead of their taser didn't do anything wrong... And yet...

You're clearly not a legal expert, so offer an opinion and not a definitive.

Also....in the scenario I painted for you, would you have decked Splotty and do you think you would have a defence in doing so? :hehe:
 

QM Redux

Banned
Ballon d'Or Winner
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
Joined
30 Dec 2020
Messages
4,461
Reaction score
2,071
Reactions
2,889 35 619
Country
Mars
Credits
35
My argument is that you've had two brief clips that don't seem to show the full story and you've decided that there are no mitigating circumstances that may have led to the assault.

In both, there's *distance* between McBurnie and the Leeds fan.

In both clips, McBurnie is the one moving towards the guy and instigating physicality.

How do you know McBurnie has "no defence"?!

Only defence he could raise would be self-defence - you don't need to have been struck but have reasonable grounds to feel in danger. In this instance, the distance between the two rules that defence out...

Also....in the scenario I painted for you, would you have decked Splotty and do you think you would have a defence in doing so? :hehe:

No, him following filming, being a twat (I know, that would be a reach) wouldn't give me a legal defence for dropping him on the spot.

Plus my wife would have hit him before I had chance to...
 

Heisenberg

Ballon d'Or Winner
❶ 1 YEAR ❶
↯ INB4 CHAMP 2021 ↯
Joined
9 Sep 2020
Messages
3,070
Reaction score
6,474
Reactions
6,452 9 18
Country
Czech-Republic
Credits
54,000
In both, there's *distance* between McBurnie and the Leeds fan.

In both clips, McBurnie is the one moving towards the guy and instigating physicality.



Only defence he could raise would be self-defence - you don't need to have been struck but have reasonable grounds to feel in danger. In this instance, the distance between the two rules that defence out...



No, him following filming, being a twat (I know, that would be a reach) wouldn't give me a legal defence for dropping him on the spot.

Plus my wife would have hit him before I had chance to...

From: Aggravating and mitigating factors – Sentencing - https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/explanatory-material/magistrates-court/item/aggravating-and-mitigating-factors/

Mitigating factors
Factors indicating lower culpability:
  • a greater degree of provocation than normally expected;
  • mental illness or disability;
  • youth or age, where it affects the responsibility of the individual defendant;
  • the fact that the offender played only a minor role in the offence.
Since you've got a degree in criminal law and know the full facts of the case you can tell me categorically that the first bullet point is bollocks and that you're categorically right as always (like you were about the taser lady, eh?)

Just accept that you don't know the full story and that you don't know how exactly how the law works... And just wait to find out what happens when the courts get their hands on the case, like I will be.

Your insistence that you're right about this, even though I questioned potential mitigating factors and you know there are none, shows that you're just chatting rubbish.

Talking to you is a bit like debating Splotty sometimes...

Agonising.
 

QM Redux

Banned
Ballon d'Or Winner
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
Joined
30 Dec 2020
Messages
4,461
Reaction score
2,071
Reactions
2,889 35 619
Country
Mars
Credits
35
From: Aggravating and mitigating factors – Sentencing - https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/explanatory-material/magistrates-court/item/aggravating-and-mitigating-factors/

Mitigating factors
Factors indicating lower culpability:
  • a greater degree of provocation than normally expected;
  • mental illness or disability;
  • youth or age, where it affects the responsibility of the individual defendant;
  • the fact that the offender played only a minor role in the offence.
Since you've got a degree in criminal law and know the full facts of the case you can tell me categorically that the first bullet point is bollocks and that you're categorically right as always (like you were about the taser lady, eh?)

Just accept that you don't know the full story and that you don't know how exactly how the law works... And just wait to find out what happens when the courts get their hands on the case, like I will be.

Your insistence that you're right about this, even though I questioned potential mitigating factors and you know there are none, shows that you're just chatting rubbish.

Talking to you is a bit like debating Splotty sometimes...

Agonising.

And that provocation was? Look at the video - he's 8 feet away, instigates the violence. He could easily have, gasp, walked away.

He's fucked and you know it, just don't want to admit it. You see him walking to the guy with the phone, knock the phone down, stamp on phone and the video catches him throwing punches.

EDIT: I point out he's got no defence. You respond by citing mitigating factors... used for sentencing. As in sentencing after being convicted. Maybe I wasn't clear enough, something that often happens, but he's fucked in providing a defence because self-defence will not be an option to him.

Do I think he'll serve prison time? Hopefully but I'd doubt it.
 

Heisenberg

Ballon d'Or Winner
❶ 1 YEAR ❶
↯ INB4 CHAMP 2021 ↯
Joined
9 Sep 2020
Messages
3,070
Reaction score
6,474
Reactions
6,452 9 18
Country
Czech-Republic
Credits
54,000
And that provocation was? Look at the video - he's 8 feet away, instigates the violence. He could easily have, gasp, walked away.

He's fucked and you know it, just don't want to admit it. You see him walking to the guy with the phone, knock the phone down, stamp on phone and the video catches him throwing punches.

EDIT: I point out he's got no defence. You respond by citing mitigating factors... used for sentencing. As in sentencing after being convicted. Maybe I wasn't clear enough, something that often happens, but he's fucked in providing a defence because self-defence will not be an option to him.

Do I think he'll serve prison time? Hopefully but I'd doubt it.
FFS... The videos you keep banging on about are but one piece of the evidence. All I'm asking you to do is consider that you haven't got all of the information and evidence to hand to tell us what's going to happen.

You are convinced that you are right but I'm just suggesting that you slow your role for a moment and consider that there's further evidence that may suggest he's not as guilty as you suggest.

Personally, from what we've seen, then I think he's guilty... But I'm not arrogant enough to say that what I think is 100% right and just take the alleged victim's word for what he says took place.

Why the fuck would I have problem admitting he's fucked?! It's Oli McBurnie FFS... I have nothing but disdain for the trampy c**t.

The two videos don't seem to inter-connect directly and you're wrong about McBurnie being the party who approaches the other in both.

He is walking toward the victim in the first video in the thread... But unless he's got Go-Go Gadget arms, he doesn't knock the phone out of his hand. Watch it again. He definitely stamps on it though and then we see him hit the guy.

The second video shows the guy with the camera walking towards McBurnie too... are you blind?!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I’m not sure if it’s the best idea to tweet this but apparently it’s been leaked by someone else anyways so here you go... he’s constantly getting harassed by these idiots <a href="https://t.co/nkwg4nYmlD">pic.twitter.com/nkwg4nYmlD</a></p>&mdash; ‏ً (@SufcLuke_) <a href="">May 11, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


The guy who is filming is walking towards McBurnie shouting "wha'ya gahnadoabowwrih" (I think). You've made your decision for the prosecution and you can't even get two facts straight from two 20-odd-second videos :hehe:

Also, the alleged assault looks like it takes place in a completely different street... There appears to be more to this story than what the two videos show.

You said categorically that he has no defence. I literally found something that a defence barrister would use to potentially defend him... Mitigating circumstances used in sentencing. He may end up getting charged but you have continually said that he's the only one in the wrong... If that's the case, then there wouldn't be mitigating circumstances to potentially get him a lighter sentence.

Sometimes that's literally all a defence can do is push for a lighter sentence due to mitigating circumstances... But you know best, of course.

A.G.O.N.I.S.I.N.G. :hehe:
 

Steve R

Ballon d'Or Winner
🏆 GOLD VIP 🏆
❹ 4 YEARS ❹
🗐🗐🗐 30 PAGER 🗐🗐🗐
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
I ❤ NG
WEED CLUB
🍺 BEER CLUB 🍺
Joined
28 Aug 2017
Messages
14,087
Reaction score
35,444
Reactions
36,011 312 90
Credits
8,363,320
FFS... The videos you keep banging on about are but one piece of the evidence. All I'm asking you to do is consider that you haven't got all of the information and evidence to hand to tell us what's going to happen.

You are convinced that you are right but I'm just suggesting that you slow your role for a moment and consider that there's further evidence that may suggest he's not as guilty as you suggest.

Personally, from what we've seen, then I think he's guilty... But I'm not arrogant enough to say that what I think is 100% right and just take the alleged victim's word for what he says took place.

Why the fuck would I have problem admitting he's fucked?! It's Oli McBurnie FFS... I have nothing but disdain for the trampy c**t.

The two videos don't seem to inter-connect directly and you're wrong about McBurnie being the party who approaches the other in both.

He is walking toward the victim in the first video in the thread... But unless he's got Go-Go Gadget arms, he doesn't knock the phone out of his hand. Watch it again. He definitely stamps on it though and then we see him hit the guy.

The second video shows the guy with the camera walking towards McBurnie too... are you blind?!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I’m not sure if it’s the best idea to tweet this but apparently it’s been leaked by someone else anyways so here you go... he’s constantly getting harassed by these idiots <a href="https://t.co/nkwg4nYmlD">pic.twitter.com/nkwg4nYmlD</a></p>&mdash; ‏ً (@SufcLuke_) <a href="">May 11, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


The guy who is filming is walking towards McBurnie shouting "wha'ya gahnadoabowwrih" (I think). You've made your decision for the prosecution and you can't even get two facts straight from two 20-odd-second videos :hehe:

Also, the alleged assault looks like it takes place in a completely different street... There appears to be more to this story than what the two videos show.

You said categorically that he has no defence. I literally found something that a defence barrister would use to potentially defend him... Mitigating circumstances used in sentencing. He may end up getting charged but you have continually said that he's the only one in the wrong... If that's the case, then there wouldn't be mitigating circumstances to potentially get him a lighter sentence.

Sometimes that's literally all a defence can do is push for a lighter sentence due to mitigating circumstances... But you know best, of course.

A.G.O.N.I.S.I.N.G. :hehe:

He's off to Prison and good enough for him too. He's a wrongun.
 

TH63

Ballon d'Or Winner
⭐ PLATINUM VIP ⭐
⚽ MODERATOR ⚽
🏃🏃🏃 500 PAGER 🏃🏃🏃
❹ 4 YEARS ❹
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
PICKEM 18/19 - 1st Place
PICKEM World Cup 2nd
$ BANK $
Joined
5 Sep 2017
Messages
23,484
Reaction score
49,880
Reactions
50,689 428 125
Country
Wales
Credits
62,695,674
 

stantys tattoos

never sober
💎 DIAMOND VIP 💎
❷ 2 YEARS ❷
PICKEM 19/20 WINNER
☘☘ 100 PAGER ☘☘
~LMS Belarus~
₡ BOOKIE ₡
I ❤ JASON PERRY
🍺 BEER CLUB 🍺
$ BANK $
Joined
20 Feb 2019
Messages
54,833
Reaction score
72,079
Reactions
73,092 591 109
Country
Wales
Credits
91,004,000
not his year bless him

 

Llandoch Blue

Club and Country Superstar
❶ 1 YEAR ❶
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
I ❤ NG
WEED CLUB
🍺 BEER CLUB 🍺
Joined
30 Jul 2020
Messages
744
Reaction score
856
Reactions
866 1 5
Country
Wales
Credits
2,291,000
Just read this under the same post. She probably felt threatened herself with a group of lads harassing her boyfriend.

Fuk him McBurnie is a top class bellend, I'd love to be in the lads shoes giving him shit :hehe:
 

Jimmytaff

Sir Jim, Earl of Llandaf
💎 DIAMOND VIP 💎
👑 KING OF THE FORUM 👑
❷ 2 YEARS ❷
~LMS Deutschland~
🗐 10 PAGER 🗐
💛❼ WHITTINGHAM ❼💛
I ❤ GILES
I ❤ BRIAN CLARK
I ❤ JASON PERRY
I ❤ KIEFFER MOORE
I ❤ NG
WEED CLUB
🍺 BEER CLUB 🍺
Joined
6 Jul 2019
Messages
12,082
Reaction score
14,763
Reactions
16,204 26 701
Country
Wales
Credits
32,503,074

Heisenberg

Ballon d'Or Winner
❶ 1 YEAR ❶
↯ INB4 CHAMP 2021 ↯
Joined
9 Sep 2020
Messages
3,070
Reaction score
6,474
Reactions
6,452 9 18
Country
Czech-Republic
Credits
54,000

Login or Register

Forgot your password?
or register in seconds
with your social account
Don't have an account? Register now

Latest Fun Bets

Top