The latest Labour Farce

[QM Redux]

Mares are hardly an answer to the very information that you requested. The notion that left-wing political values and principles, centered around policies which advocate for a fairer society for all, are un-electable are patently false.

Clearly those policies found favour with a large percentage of voters.

What followed the 2017 GE, was a concerted campaign by Tories, right-wing internal factions of Labour, newspaper billionaire owners, other media outlets, along with smear campaigns that were directed both with foreign and domestic lobbyists, all because Corbyn was seen by his opponents, as being highly electable.

Yes, he was so highly electable he lost again May, who ran probably the worst ever election campaign by a Tory.

Yup, it was all a CONSPIRACY ( probably by those who eat bagels ), after all Corbyn was a really unlucky anti-racist who just happened to speak at conferences with antisemites, have a highly antisemitic brother, invite antisemites to HoC. How could he have known? He's so anti-racist he was devoting his time to fighting racism, researching who he was associating with would merely take too much of his valuable time down to allotment up.

 

[QM Redux]

I would argue that Centrist is Labour-lite.

It is also possible to be centrist, without being a Blair supporter.

I would argue centrist is errm centrist. Either lite of both major parties or not lite of anything.

 

[QM Redux]

Really? Is that why in addition to 'advising' Starmer, Blair 'advises' Matt Hancock as well? Not to mention taking $19.5 million off of Bill Gates for advocating on his behalf as well.

So where exactly does Gates pay Blair 19.5m for advocating on his behalf?

 

[Dr. Lecter]

Well I think we can all agree that Splotty has proved everyone wrong once again.

Let that be a lesson to all the far right Zionists on here - there’s no disputing the truth when stats for lefties is on the case.

 

[Worse]

it wasn't the information i requested but there we go

It's a simple concept to get your head around Kiffa. Either a GE vote share of 42%, is proof that specific proposed policies have found favour with 42% of those voting in that election, or it isn't.

If you argue that it isn't, then you'll need to explain why or what, 42% of voters voted for in 2017.

 

[Arfur Ap Llewellyn Europe]

I agree with you completely. Personally given a choice between listening to the daily right-wing, establishment crap and having root canal treatment, I would be heading for the dentist.
I was made aware this morning of Stamer's interview, which can be viewed on Twitter already, probably on LBC's website a bit later today. He clearly feels more at home with right wing zealots like LBC or the Telegraph. What else would you expect from someone associated as a member of the Trilateral Commission.

I have to say those were also my initial thoughts about LBC, but I've found it surprisingly balanced, and they actually hammer the Tories far more than you'll find on the BBC etc.

The presenters tend to be Tory then Left Wing then Tory then Left Wing etc etc

David Lammy and James O'Brien being two examples.

 

[Dr. Lecter]

So where exactly does Gates pay Blair 19.5m for advocating on his behalf?

All the information is freely available on the internet.

You just have to do your own research.

 

[kiffa]

It's a simple concept to get your head around Kiffa. Either a GE vote share of 42%, is proof that specific proposed policies have found favour with 42% of those voting in that election, or it isn't.

If you argue that it isn't, then you'll need to explain why or what, 42% of voters voted for in 2017.

Are you able to provide UK wide stats first of all?

And also the most recent GE if you don't mind seeing as that's the nearest indicator of public voting

Thanks in advance

 

[Dr. Lecter]

Are you able to provide UK wide stats first of all?

And also the most recent GE if you don't mind seeing as that's the nearest indicator of public voting

Thanks in advance

But you can’t count those results because there was a conspiracy to stop super Jeremy storming to power.

 

[QM Redux]

It's a simple concept to get your head around Kiffa. Either a GE vote share of 42%, is proof that specific proposed policies have found favour with 42% of those voting in that election, or it isn't.

If you argue that it isn't, then you'll need to explain why or what, 42% of voters voted for in 2017.

And this is where Splotty loses the plot and become Sty.

He claims people loved Corbyn's policies so much that they voted for him. The SAME policies however received a lower vote share the next election.

What he fails to grasp is that Corbyn's bounce in 2017 was down to mobilising his core support without reaching out to the center and also doe to being up against a woeful campaign by May. He fails to consider many Tories simply failed to vote for May.

 

[QM Redux]

But you can’t count those results because there was a conspiracy to stop super Jeremy Der Sturming to power.

FYP

 

[Worse]

Are you able to provide UK wide stats first of all?

And also the most recent GE if you don't mind seeing as that's the nearest indicator of public voting

Thanks in advance

UK stats

84% of the voting population are in England alone. England and Wales numbers are usually conjoined purely for UK elections, so that takes it up to about 88% of the total UK population.
What difference do you think the remaining 12% would make to any results?

 

[TH63]

Not only that, they forgot about Scotland entirely

Not to mention Splotty not quoting the most recent performance of course

And Northern Ireland

 

[QM Redux]

UK stats

84% of the voting population are in England alone. England and Wales numbers are usually conjoined purely for UK elections, so that takes it up to about 88% of the total UK population.
What difference do you think the remaining 12% would make to any results?

So only cite a proportion of the actual figures because that suits your point.

 

[QM Redux]

And Northern Ireland

Sheesh, those poor Northern Irelanders.

They could cope with being overlooked by the likes of Splotty, but when even Kiffa forgets them...

 

[QM Redux]

Next Splotty post.

"100% of voters that voted for Corbyn voted for Corbyn. Conclusive proof the election was robbed".

 

[Dr. Lecter]

And this is where Splotty loses the plot and become Sty.

He claims people loved Corbyn's policies so much that they voted for him. The SAME policies however received a lower vote share the next election.

What he fails to grasp is that Corbyn's bounce in 2017 was down to mobilising his core support without reaching out to the center and also doe to being up against a woeful campaign by May. He fails to consider many Tories simply failed to vote for May.

Listen Sonny, it’s been proven by the Socialist Worker that Corbyn was such a threat to the tories that Zionists paid off every tailors in London so that he had to buy his clothes from The PDSA. Not only that but all the barbers in London are fronts for far right ideology and as a result Jeremy had to cut his own hair with a spoon.

Anyway 42% of the vote, Tony Blair, Bill Gates, The BBC, stats, etc. Wibble,....

 

[Worse]

I have to say those were also my initial thoughts about LBC, but I've found it surprisingly balanced, and they actually hammer the Tories far more than you'll find on the BBC etc.

The presenters tend to be Tory then Left Wing then Tory then Left Wing etc etc

David Lammy and James O'Brien being two examples.

Mmm... maybe take another look at J.O.B.

Leading Britain's Condescension: James O'Brien boils over and Nicholas Witchell does free PR for Buckingham Palace

Sometimes, when the mask slips, we see the roiling rage beneath the media's pseudo-civil face.

brokenbottleboy.substack.com

 

[TH63]

Let's have it right Kiffa

That peak in 1997 44% of the vote - care to point out to the boys and girls who the labour leader was then?

 

[QM Redux]

That peak in 1997 - care to point out to the boys and girls who the labour leader was then?

Oooo! I know! I know!