Ah, perhaps this a disagreement over form then? What can work in one (literature) might not work in another (film) regardless of how faithful an adaptation it is, for me at least. My main gripes with them were that it felt episodic, they were overly long (ANY film over two hours has me questioning the writing) and the third one had about six different endings, all more sentimental than the one before. Perhaps having not read the books left me at a disadvantage in watching the film in the same way that having read War of the Worlds, I thought the Tom Cruise adaptation was a load of old tripe despite being very popular with others (and managing to clock in under two hours

).
I realise I might be in the minority with LOTR though as Mrs Arkay went to see the first one six times at the cinema. SIX TIMES! It's any wonder I married her at all.