Mrs Udal will not sign off on a dishwasher. Every cloud, my hands lovely and soft
Ryan Giggs Court Case
- Thread Starter Glos Blue
- Start date
Mrs Udal will not sign off on a dishwasher. Every cloud, my hands lovely and soft
No and a thousand times no.
Full poem here Ladies and Gentlemen.
Enjoy
Someone believing in you making you hard as a totem pole is a pretty low bar.
My history teacher at Barry Boys believed in me...
I have to thank Mr Phillips for making me hard all those years. A truly gentle and loving man.
WEED CLUB
G is for Giving you a punch, because the spoons in the dishwasher were loaded wrong
I is for I will batter your sister if she chats back to me again
G is for Going to fucking kill you if you bring up my brother again
G is for Goal against Aston Villa that one time. I love it as much as I love you and/or Paul Scholes
S is for Slapping you down as your sister begs for mercy
I is for I will batter your sister if she chats back to me again
G is for Going to fucking kill you if you bring up my brother again
G is for Goal against Aston Villa that one time. I love it as much as I love you and/or Paul Scholes
S is for Slapping you down as your sister begs for mercy
The difference is that this is a criminal case brought by the CPS not a civil one brought by the girlfriend.
EDIT: Ooops, wrong thread...
Haven’t been following apart from what’s been on here but has there been any other proof that Giggs was knocking her about and not that’s he’s just an odd ball sex deviant weirdo
The main charge is to do with controlling and coercive behaviour. He may or may not have been violent also.
They're no Johnny and Amber that's for sure
Nuggles Spoons smoking section do
Let's hope so
The problem for police and CPS is that the evidence is that the ex is incredible devious and manipulative; the text messages slaughter their case.
1) Claimed cancerous cells found in smear test when she actually had her coil removed. Slept with Giggs after that - trying to trap him with a baby. As they had no kid and weren't married, them splitting meant she'd get precisely zero. "I'm going to get something out of this" (paraphrasing).
2) The photo op she used to show bruising. Text messages showed it was set up - her and a mate were talking about the money they could make. Ex then whines the "prick" of a photographer used a photo that showed her looking rough; a further message had her saying that "the photo worked in her benefit as it didn't look staged" (again, paraphrasing).
3) Claiming bruising that she explained to friends was "caused by rough sex" was really domestic violence, she only said that to cover up. A text sequence showed her talking to Giggs about handcuffs and he'd bought a paddle... another sequence had her referring to "bruised knees" and "carpet burns on her back" - "a good session".
4) There was also as seems usual for women in cases, her losing two phones and refusing to give police full access claiming business contacts were in there and she didn't trust the police.
Plenty of other stuff in there too, I just don't get how police and CPS even decided to take this to court. There are just so many contradictions on her side that it's difficult to establish her as a credible person.
That said, he's clearly a grade A fuckwit after any pussy he sees.
Maybe there’s actually some evidence that they haven’t shared with you, Rumpole.
